On Thu, May 14, 2026, Jim Mattson wrote:
> On Thu, May 14, 2026 at 9:20 AM Sean Christopherson <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Oooh, this is based on the generic CPL rules.  I didn't think about it from 
> > that
> > perspective.  So yeah, addressing that does make sense.  What a pain.
> 
> When I fix this in version 4, what's the correct footer for Sashiko 
> attribution:
> 
> Assisted-by: Sashiko:gemini/gemini-3.1-pro-preview
> 
> or
> 
> Reported-by: Sashiko:gemini/gemini-3.1-pro-preview

This, or even just:

  Reported-by: Sashiko

is good enough for me.  I don't expect random developers to know or care what
model was used, at least not when it comes to reporting bugs.  If you use AI to
help write the code, then maybe I'd care?

Reply via email to