On Tue, Apr 28, 2026 at 11:15:13AM +0100, Leo Yan wrote: > > It's not glibc specific so it seems reasonable to keep it in gcs-util.h, > > even though we don't currently have any nolibc stuff that uses ptrace. > > That said this isn't particularly strongly held opinion so I don't > > *really* mind either way.
> Does below change make sense to you? That looks fine to me.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
