On Wed, 15 Apr 2026, Marcos Paulo de Souza wrote: > On Wed, 2026-04-15 at 14:01 +0200, Miroslav Benes wrote: > > On Mon, 13 Apr 2026, Marcos Paulo de Souza wrote: > > > > > A new version of the patchset, with fewer patches now. Please take > > > a look! > > > > > > Original cover-letter: > > > These patches don't really change how the patches are run, just > > > skip > > > some tests on kernels that don't support a feature (like kprobe and > > > livepatched living together) or when a livepatch sysfs attribute is > > > missing. > > > > > > The last patch slightly adjusts check_result function to skip dmesg > > > messages on SLE kernels when a livepatch is removed. > > > > > > These patches are based on printk/for-next branch. > > > > > > Please review! Thanks! > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Marcos Paulo de Souza <[email protected]> > > > > Besides my comment for 1/6 and what Sashiko discovered, it looks good > > to > > me. > > > > However, please also take a look at brand new > > test_modules/test_klp_mod_target.c. It does not build on old kernels > > since > > they lack proc_create_single(). I think it should be covered in this > > patch > > set too. > > I saw that yesterday as well, but I wanted to merge this series first. > I have plans to create a way to unregister the livepatches if something > fails, so we can continue to run the other tests. I was planning to fix > the test_klp_mod_target.c in the same patchset.
Fair enough. Miroslav
