Older kernels that lack CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_SYSCALL_WRAPPER config don't have any prefixes for their syscalls. The same applies to current powerpc and loongarch, covering all currently supported architectures that support livepatch.
The other supported architectures have specific prefixes, so error out when a new architecture adds livepatch support with wrappes but didn't update the test to include it. Signed-off-by: Marcos Paulo de Souza <[email protected]> --- .../selftests/livepatch/test_modules/test_klp_syscall.c | 17 ++++++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/livepatch/test_modules/test_klp_syscall.c b/tools/testing/selftests/livepatch/test_modules/test_klp_syscall.c index dd802783ea84..b5527a288a7c 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/livepatch/test_modules/test_klp_syscall.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/livepatch/test_modules/test_klp_syscall.c @@ -12,15 +12,26 @@ #include <linux/slab.h> #include <linux/livepatch.h> -#if defined(__x86_64__) +/* + * Before CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_SYSCALL_WRAPPER was introduced there were no + * prefixes for system calls. + * Both ppc and loongarch does not set prefixes for their system calls either. + */ +#if !defined(CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_SYSCALL_WRAPPER) || defined(__powerpc__) || \ + defined(__loongarch__) +#define FN_PREFIX +#elif defined(__x86_64__) #define FN_PREFIX __x64_ #elif defined(__s390x__) #define FN_PREFIX __s390x_ #elif defined(__aarch64__) #define FN_PREFIX __arm64_ -#else -/* powerpc does not select ARCH_HAS_SYSCALL_WRAPPER */ +#elif defined(__powerpc__) +#define FN_PREFIX +#elif defined(__loongarch__) #define FN_PREFIX +#else +#error "Missing syscall wrapper for the given architecture." #endif /* Protects klp_pids */ -- 2.52.0
