On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 04:09:34PM +0100, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote: > Dnia Thursday, 7 of February 2008, Sam Ravnborg napisał: > > On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 07:58:24AM -0500, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > > > Any chance to make arm finally use drivers/Kconfig? It's a bit silly > > > that arm still is crapping around while even s390 uses it. > > > rmk said that it should be easy to check the amount of work needed to > > do so. But I have not had time to look into it yet - hopefully someone > > in ARM land could fix it. > > I looked at it and 'arch/arm/Kconfig' does not source few entries:
diff -u arch/arm/Kconfig drivers/Kconfig shows the situation. This is why I insist that new entries to arch/arm/Kconfig should be in the same order as drivers/Kconfig. > Including of 'drivers/mtd' depends on "ALIGNMENT_TRAP || !CPU_CP15_MMU". It's this which is the main issue. > Including of 'drivers/ide' depends on "PCMCIA || ARCH_CLPS7500 || > ARCH_IOP32X || ARCH_IOP33X || ARCH_IXP4XX || ARCH_L7200 || > ARCH_LH7A40X || ARCH_PXA || ARCH_RPC || ARCH_S3C2410 || ARCH_SA1100 || > ARCH_SHARK || FOOTBRIDGE || ARCH_IXP23XX" but 'drivers/ata' (which can be > used instead on PCMCIA enabled platforms) does not depend on such set. IDE people insisted that we _will_ have that silly conditional for IDE. I personally do not want it and would be happy to see it go - but I don't have the authority to do that. Take this one up with Bart. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
