On Tue, Apr 07, 2026, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> +Michael

Let's try that again.  Email address #1 bounced.

> On Tue, Apr 07, 2026, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
> > Thomas Lefebvre <[email protected]> writes:
> > > Under Hyper-V, raw RDTSC values are not consistent across vCPUs.
> > > The hypervisor corrects them only through the TSC page scale/offset.
> > > If pvclock_update_vm_gtod_copy() runs on CPU 0 and __get_kvmclock()
> > > later runs on CPU 1 where the raw TSC is lower, the unsigned
> > > subtraction wraps.
> > >
> > 
> > According to the TLFS, reference TSC page is partition wide:
> > 
> > "The hypervisor provides a partition-wide virtual reference TSC page
> > which is overlaid on the partition’s GPA space. A partition’s reference
> > time stamp counter page is accessed through the Reference TSC MSR."
> > 
> > so if as you say RAW rdtsc value is inconsistent across vCPUs, I can
> > hardly see how we can use this time source at all, even without
> > KVM. scale/offset are the same for all vCPUs.
> > 
> > I think the fix here is to avoid setting up Hyper-V TSC page clocksource
> > in L1. Unfortunately, with unsynchronized TSCs this will leave us the
> > only choice for a sane clocksource: raw HV_X64_MSR_TIME_REF_COUNT MSR
> > reads.
> 
> This feels like either a Hyper-V bug or a Linux-as-a-guest bug.  For 
> "Reference
> Counter"[1]:
> 
>   The hypervisor maintains a per-partition reference time counter. It has the
>   characteristic that successive accesses to it return strictly monotonically
>   increasing (time) values as seen by any and all virtual processors of a
>   partition. Furthermore, the reference counter is rate constant and 
> unaffected
>   by processor or bus speed transitions or deep processor power savings 
> states. A
>   partition’s reference time counter is initialized to zero when the 
> partition is
>   created. The reference counter for all partitions count at the same rate, 
> but
>   at any time, their absolute values will typically differ because partitions
>   will have different creation times.
>   
>   The reference counter continues to count up as long as at least one virtual
>   processor is not explicitly suspended.
> 
> 
> And then "Partition Reference Time Enlightenment"[2]:
> 
>   The partition reference time enlightenment presents a reference time source 
> to
>   a partition which does not require an intercept into the hypervisor. This
>   enlightenment is available only when the underlying platform provides 
> support
>   of an invariant processor Time Stamp Counter (TSC), or iTSC. In such 
> platforms,
>   the processor TSC frequency remains constant irrespective of changes in the
>   processor’s clock frequency due to the use of power management states such 
> as
>   ACPI processor performance states, processor idle sleep states (ACPI 
> C-states),
>   etc.
> 
>   The partition reference time enlightenment uses a virtual TSC value, an 
> offset
>   and a multiplier to enable a guest partition to compute the normalized
>   reference time since partition creation, in 100nS units. The mechanism also
>   allows a guest partition to atomically compute the reference time when the
>   guest partition is migrated to a platform with a different TSC rate, and
>   provides a fallback mechanism to support migration to platforms without the
>   constant rate TSC feature.
> 
> My read of "Partition Reference Time Enlightenment" is that it should only be
> advertised if the TSC is synchronized and constant.  I can't figure out where
> that feature is actually advertised though, because IIUC it's not the same as
> HV_ACCESS_TSC_INVARIANT, which says that the virtual TSC is guaranteed to be
> invariant even across live migration.  And it's not 
> HV_MSR_REFERENCE_TSC_AVAILABLE,
> because I'm pretty sure that just says HV_MSR_REFERENCE_TSC is available.
> 
> Michael, help?
> 
> [1] 
> https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/virtualization/hyper-v-on-windows/tlfs/timers#reference-counter
> [2] 
> https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/virtualization/hyper-v-on-windows/tlfs/timers#partition-reference-time-enlightenment

Reply via email to