On 03/03/2026 09:59, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
On 01/03/2026 00:51, David Heidelberg via B4 Relay wrote:
@bod
Proliferating special cases in switch statements on a per-SoC basis is
verboten.
Hmm, your ideas are intriguing to me, and I wish to subscribe to your
newsletter.
---
bod
@David.
I'm realising my Simpson's reference probably isn't actionable
development feedback ;)
How about embeddding a pointer to either a DPHY or CPHY init sequence
somewhere and checking that pointer ?
If it the CPHY init sequence/table in this case, is NULL return
-EOPTNOTSUPP.
That way instead of constantly extending a switch for each new SoC we
enumerate a pointer and check that pointer's validity.
Then we have nice clean code which just checks the value of a pointer,
instead of an ever-growing list of SoCs in a switch.
---
bod
