>>>>> "Guillaume" == Guillaume Gonnet <[email protected]> writes:

 > Hello Peter,
 > Here are my answers to your questions.

Thanks for the details.

 >> This looks nontrivial, a comment would be helpful.

 > I think the commit message contains enough information to understand why
 > the second wait_for_device_probe() call is required, a comment would
 > contain less information so I prefer letting the code like that.

OK. Ideally the above description would have made it into the commit
message, but fine.

-- 
Bye, Peter Korsgaard

Reply via email to