On Tue, 10 Mar 2026 00:03:29 +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> The different subsystems implementing the QMI service protocol are
> using their own definition of the service id. It is not a problem but
> it results on having those duplicated with different names but the
> same value and without consistency in their name.
>
> It makes more sense to unify their names and move the definitions in
> the QMI header file providing a consistent way to represent the
> supported protocols. Consequently the different drivers will use them
> instead of their own definition of the service id.
>
> [...]
Applied, thanks!
[6/8] soc: qcom: pdr: Use the unified QMI service ID instead of defining it
locally
commit: 24f80cbe0b8f4c6b27d03c7a7ad707d76c1c4885
[8/8] samples: qmi: Use the unified QMI service ID instead of defining it
locally
commit: 8baf6b3b7695849581a91bdaf66af2be68ef32ed
Best regards,
--
Bjorn Andersson <[email protected]>
