On Wed, 2008-02-06 at 19:44 +0000, Alan Cox wrote: > On Wed, 06 Feb 2008 12:38:42 -0700 > Zan Lynx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > This doesn't happen often so it is rather hard to nail down, but I am > > fairly sure it didn't happen before I started running the 2.6.24 MM > > series kernels. > > Do you have the -mm1 hot fixes applied if its occuring in 2.6.24-mm1 ?
All of them except stop-c_p_a-corrupting-the-pds.patch but I don't think that matters since the patch description says it affects x86_32 and this system is x86_64. -- Zan Lynx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part