Tue, Mar 03, 2026 at 04:14:48AM +0100, [email protected] wrote: >On Fri, 27 Feb 2026 00:19:16 +0200 Tariq Toukan wrote: >> +Currently, port-level resources only support the ``GET`` command for viewing >> +resource information. > >In case there is v4, AI says: > >> +Currently, port-level resources only support the ``GET`` command for viewing > ^^^^^ > >This isn't a bug, but the terminology here appears inconsistent with the >rest of the documentation. The document uses user-facing command names >elsewhere (like "devlink port resource show"), but this line uses "GET >command" which seems to reference the internal DEVLINK_CMD_PORT_RESOURCE_GET >netlink command. > >Should this be reworded to match the user-facing terminology used throughout >the rest of the document, perhaps "only support the show command" or >"only support viewing"?
AI does not see the context here. This is in-line with the rest of the get commands.
