On Wednesday 06 February 2008 01:32, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> Looks OK. Minorish things from a quick scan:
>
>
>
> tosakbd_scankeyboard() looks like it'll spend a perfectly wicked amount of
> time under spin_lock_irqsave().
>
I think you are right. I will check with Dmitry if it can be relaxed a bit.
>
>
> This code, in tosakbd_probe():
>
> +fail2:
> + while (--i >= 0)
> + gpio_free(TOSA_GPIO_KEY_STROBE(i));
> +
> + i = TOSA_KEY_SENSE_NUM;
> +fail:
> + while (--i >= 0) {
> + free_irq(gpio_to_irq(TOSA_GPIO_KEY_SENSE(i)), pdev);
> + gpio_free(TOSA_GPIO_KEY_SENSE(i));
> + }
>
> looks like it'll free irqs and gpios which were never allocated (if i <
> TOSA_KEY_SENSE_NUM on entry).
>
Umm? There are 2 groups of gpios (sense and strobe) with sense group
registered first. Looks ok to me.
>
>
> +static int __devinit tosakbd_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) {
>
> please integrate checkpatch into your merging process.
>
Will do.
>
>
>
> i8042_platform_init():
>
> +#if defined(__i386__) || defined(__x86_64__)
>
> use #ifdef CONFIG_X86?
>
I considered it but above was tested and in line with the style of the
rest of the file...
--
Dmitry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
