On Mon, Jan 12, 2026 at 08:38:26AM +0100, Eugenio Perez Martin wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 11, 2026 at 12:46 AM Michael S. Tsirkin <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 09, 2026 at 04:24:22PM +0100, Eugenio Pérez wrote:
> > > Remove duplication by consolidating these here.  This reduces the
> > > posibility of a parent driver missing them.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Eugenio Pérez <[email protected]>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c | 3 ---
> > >  drivers/vdpa/vdpa_sim/vdpa_sim.c  | 6 ------
> > >  drivers/vhost/vdpa.c              | 2 +-
> > >  3 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 10 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c 
> > > b/drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c
> > > index ddaa1366704b..44062e9d68f0 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c
> > > @@ -3640,9 +3640,6 @@ static int mlx5_set_group_asid(struct vdpa_device 
> > > *vdev, u32 group,
> > >       struct mlx5_vdpa_dev *mvdev = to_mvdev(vdev);
> > >       int err = 0;
> > >
> > > -     if (group >= MLX5_VDPA_NUMVQ_GROUPS)
> > > -             return -EINVAL;
> > > -
> > >       mvdev->mres.group2asid[group] = asid;
> > >
> > >       mutex_lock(&mvdev->mres.lock);
> > > diff --git a/drivers/vdpa/vdpa_sim/vdpa_sim.c 
> > > b/drivers/vdpa/vdpa_sim/vdpa_sim.c
> > > index c1c6431950e1..df9c7ddc5d78 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/vdpa/vdpa_sim/vdpa_sim.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/vdpa/vdpa_sim/vdpa_sim.c
> > > @@ -606,12 +606,6 @@ static int vdpasim_set_group_asid(struct vdpa_device 
> > > *vdpa, unsigned int group,
> > >       struct vhost_iotlb *iommu;
> > >       int i;
> > >
> > > -     if (group > vdpasim->dev_attr.ngroups)
> > > -             return -EINVAL;
> > > -
> >
> > BTW is the original ">" here an off by one error? Should have been >= ?
> > if yes then this is a kind of bugfix and maybe needs a fixes tag.
> >
> 
> Ouch that's a good catch, thanks! Do you prefer me to mark this patch
> as "Fixes:" and send it for backporting to stable to or to create a
> new patch just adding the ">=" and then moving the check to the vdpa
> core on top?

It seems adequate to just send this to backporting.
Do document that this is a fix in the commit log though.


> > > -     if (asid >= vdpasim->dev_attr.nas)
> > > -             return -EINVAL;
> > > -
> > >       iommu = &vdpasim->iommu[asid];
> > >
> > >       mutex_lock(&vdpasim->mutex);
> > > diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c b/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c
> > > index 05a481e4c385..9d25b735b43d 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c
> > > @@ -680,7 +680,7 @@ static long vhost_vdpa_vring_ioctl(struct vhost_vdpa 
> > > *v, unsigned int cmd,
> > >       case VHOST_VDPA_SET_GROUP_ASID:
> > >               if (copy_from_user(&s, argp, sizeof(s)))
> > >                       return -EFAULT;
> > > -             if (s.num >= vdpa->nas)
> > > +             if (idx >= vdpa->ngroups || s.num >= vdpa->nas)
> > >                       return -EINVAL;
> > >               if (!ops->set_group_asid)
> > >                       return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > > --
> > > 2.52.0
> >


Reply via email to