On Sun, 28 Jan 2001, Felix von Leitner wrote: > What is missing here is a good authoritative web ressource that tells > people which NIC to buy. > I have a tulip NIC because a few years ago that apparently was the NIC > of choice. It has good multicast (which is important to me), but AFAIK > it has neither scatter-gather nor hardware checksumming. > Is there such a web page already? http://www.anime.net/~goemon/cardz/ Based on discussions I've had with Donald Becker about chipsets. For 100bt, 3c905C is the most efficient card at the moment. I've no idea about gigglebit ethernet. -Dan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: Still not sexy! (Re: sendf... jamal
- Re: Still not sexy! (Re: sendf... David S. Miller
- Re: Still not sexy! (Re: sendf... Rick Jones
- Re: sendfile+zerocopy: fairly sexy (nothing to do with E... jamal
- Re: sendfile+zerocopy: fairly sexy (nothing to do with E... Andrew Morton
- Re: sendfile+zerocopy: fairly sexy (nothing to do w... Felix von Leitner
- Re: sendfile+zerocopy: fairly sexy (nothing to ... Dan Hollis
- Re: sendfile+zerocopy: fairly sexy (nothing to ... Andi Kleen
- Re: sendfile+zerocopy: fairly sexy (nothing... Pavel Machek
- Re: sendfile+zerocopy: fairly sexy (nothing to ... Gregory Maxwell
- Choosing Linux NICs (was: Re: sendfile+zerocopy... Felix von Leitner
- RE: sendfile+zerocopy: fairly sexy (nothing to do with E... Jonathan Earle
- Re: sendfile+zerocopy: fairly sexy (nothing to do with E... Bernd Eckenfels