On Mon, Dec 22, 2025 at 11:22:16AM +0100, Thomas Weißschuh wrote: > On Mon, Dec 22, 2025 at 03:39:12AM -0500, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 22, 2025 at 09:00:33AM +0100, Thomas Weißschuh wrote: > > > Using libc types and headers from the UAPI headers is problematic as it > > > introduces a dependency on a full C toolchain. > > > > > > On Linux 'unsigned long' works as a replacement for 'uintptr_t' and does > > > not depend on libc. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <[email protected]> > > > > > > are you fixing other uses of uintptr_t ? > > I am focussing on UAPI headers which include libc headers. > virtio_ring.h seems to be the only such header which uses uintptr_t. > There are a few other UAPI headers which reference uintptr_t, but only > in comments or macros. > > uintptr_t in regular kernel code is out of scope for me. > While it is iffy, it doesn't actually hurt. > > > Thomas
And other uses of stdint.h?
