On Fri Dec 19, 2025 at 12:51 PM -03, David Ahern wrote: > On 12/19/25 7:51 AM, Fernando Fernandez Mancera wrote: >> It would probably require some work on the test but I think it could >> benefit from using two different network namespaces. Currently it is >> using PEER_NS and the default. I think avoiding the default one is >> beneficial for everyone as it ensures the state is clean and that the >> test won't interrupt the system connectivity. >> >> Other tests already do that, e.g some tests in fib_tests.sh use ns1 and >> ns2 namespaces. >> >> What do you all think? > > agreed.
Thanks, I'll send a new version later on this week then!
