On 27/11/2025 10:36, Mike Rapoport wrote:
On Wed, Nov 26, 2025 at 04:49:31PM +0000, Nikita Kalyazin wrote:
On 25/11/2025 18:38, Mike Rapoport wrote:
From: "Mike Rapoport (Microsoft)" <[email protected]>
+#ifdef CONFIG_USERFAULTFD
+static struct folio *kvm_gmem_get_folio(struct inode *inode, pgoff_t pgoff)
We have to name it differently, otherwise it clashes with the existing one
in this file.
It's all David's fault! ;-P
How about kvm_gmem_get_prepared_folio() ?
I'm afraid it may not be ideal due to preparedness tracking being
removed from guest_memfd at some point [1]. Would it be too bad to add
an indication to userfaultfd in the name somehow given that it's already
guarded by the config?
[1]
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-coco/[email protected]
--
Sincerely yours,
Mike.
