On Fri 2008-02-01 20:07:01, James Morris wrote: > On Fri, 1 Feb 2008, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > Really? I'd feel a lot more comfortable if yesterday's version 1 had led > > to a stream of comments from suitably-knowledgeable kernel developers which > > indicated that those developers had scrutinised this code from every > > conceivable angle and had declared themselves 100% happy with it. > > FWIW, I've reviewed the patch in detail a couple of times, and don't see > any issues with it that haven't already been raised by Serge. > > You can add my reviewed-by. > > I think it does need more eyes, and some time baking in -mm.
I don't thing -mm baking helps here. People playing with -mm are not the ones trying to hack your box. -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
