Sorry for the super-long time-to-feedback.

On Fri, Sep 05, 2025 at 01:11 PM +02, Michal Luczaj wrote:
> In some test cases, OOB packets might have been left unread. Flush them out
> and introduce additional checks.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michal Luczaj <m...@rbox.co>
> ---
>  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockmap_redir.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockmap_redir.c 
> b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockmap_redir.c
> index 
> c1bf1076e8152b7d83c3e07e2dce746b5a39cf7e..4997e72c14345b274367f3f2f4115c39d1ae48c9
>  100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockmap_redir.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockmap_redir.c
> @@ -184,6 +184,19 @@ static void handle_unsupported(int sd_send, int sd_peer, 
> int sd_in, int sd_out,
>                       FAIL_ERRNO("unsupported: packet missing, retval=%zd", 
> n);
>       }
>  
> +     /* af_unix send("ab", MSG_OOB) spits out 2 packets, but only the latter
> +      * ("b") is designated OOB. If the peer is in a sockmap, the OOB packet
> +      * will be silently dropped. Otherwise OOB stays in the queue and should
> +      * be taken care of.
> +      */
> +     if ((send_flags & MSG_OOB) && !pass && !drop) {

Nit: There's a similar check a few lines before that:

        if (pass == 0 && drop == 0 && (status & UNSUPPORTED_RACY_VERD)) {

For readability it might make sense to introduce a helper flag:

        bool no_verdict = !pass && !drop; /* prog didn't run */

> +             errno = 0;
> +             n = recv_timeout(sd_peer, &recv_buf, 1, MSG_OOB, 
> IO_TIMEOUT_SEC);
> +             /* Ignore unsupported sk_msg error */
> +             if (n != 1 && errno != EOPNOTSUPP)
> +                     FAIL_ERRNO("recv(OOB): retval=%zd", n);
> +     }
> +
>       /* Ensure queues are empty */
>       fail_recv("bpf.recv(sd_send)", sd_send, 0);
>       if (sd_in != sd_send)
> @@ -192,6 +205,9 @@ static void handle_unsupported(int sd_send, int sd_peer, 
> int sd_in, int sd_out,
>       fail_recv("bpf.recv(sd_out)", sd_out, 0);
>       if (sd_recv != sd_out)
>               fail_recv("bpf.recv(sd_recv)", sd_recv, 0);
> +
> +     fail_recv("recv(sd_peer, OOB)", sd_peer, MSG_OOB);
> +     fail_recv("recv(sd_out, OOB)", sd_out, MSG_OOB);
>  }
>  
>  static void test_send_redir_recv(int sd_send, int send_flags, int sd_peer,

Reviewed-by: Jakub Sitnicki <ja...@cloudflare.com>

Reply via email to