On Tue, Sep 09, 2025 at 04:16:25PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Tue, 9 Sep 2025 13:17:27 -0700 Breno Leitao wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 08, 2025 at 06:29:58PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > > > On Mon, 8 Sep 2025 13:47:24 -0700 Calvin Owens wrote: > > > > I wonder if there might be a demon lurking in bonding+netpoll that this > > > > was papering over? Not a reason not to fix the leaks IMO, I'm just > > > > curious, I don't want to spend time on it if you already did :) > > > > > > +1, I also feel like it'd be good to have some bonding tests in place > > > when we're removing a hack added specifically for bonding. > > > > Do you prefer to have a separated bonding selftest, or, is it better to > > add some bond operations in the torture selftest? > > Normal test is preferable, given the flakiness rate and patch volume > I'm a bit scared of randomized testing as part of CI.
Ok, I will create a selftest to cover the netpoll part of bonding, as soon as my understanding is good enough. I don't think it will be quick, but, it is on my hi-pri todo list. Do you want to have the selftest done before merging this patch, or, can they go in parallel?
