Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 2, 2025 at 1:46 PM Colin Ian King <colin.i.k...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > There appears to be a cut-n-paste error with the incorrect field
> > ndr_desc->numa_node being reported for the target node. Fix this by
> > using ndr_desc->target_node instead.
> >
> > Fixes: f060db99374e ("ACPI: NFIT: Use fallback node id when numa info in
> > NFIT table is incorrect")
> > Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.i.k...@gmail.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c b/drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c
> > index ae035b93da08..3eb56b77cb6d 100644
> > --- a/drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c
> > +++ b/drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c
> > @@ -2637,7 +2637,7 @@ static int acpi_nfit_register_region(struct
> > acpi_nfit_desc *acpi_desc,
> > if (ndr_desc->target_node == NUMA_NO_NODE) {
> > ndr_desc->target_node = phys_to_target_node(spa->address);
> > dev_info(acpi_desc->dev, "changing target node from %d to
> > %d for nfit region [%pa-%pa]",
> > - NUMA_NO_NODE, ndr_desc->numa_node, &res.start,
> > &res.end);
> > + NUMA_NO_NODE, ndr_desc->target_node, &res.start,
> > &res.end);
> > }
> >
> > /*
> > --
>
> Dan, Dave, are you guys going to take this one, or should I take care of it?
Apologies, I should have said I'm taking this one. It is queued up.
Thanks for the ping,
Ira
