On Sat, 27 Jan 2001, David Schwartz wrote: > > > Firewalling should be implemented on the hosts, perhaps with centralized > > policy management. In such a situation, there would be no reason to filter > > on funny IP options. > > That's madness. If you have to implement your firewalling on every host, > what do you do when someone wants to run a new OS? Forbid it? Of course. Then you find out about some new problem you want to block, so you spend the next week reconfiguring a dozen different OS firewalling systems. Hrm... I'll stick with a proper firewall, TYVM! James. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Rusty Russell
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Alan Cox
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN David Wagner
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Brian May
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Frank v Waveren
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Gregory Maxwell
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Frank v Waveren
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Jamie Lokier
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Gregory Maxwell
- RE: hotmail not dealing with ECN David Schwartz
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN James Sutherland
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Gregory Maxwell
- [OT] Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Gregory Maxwell
- Re: [OT] Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Michael H. Warfield
- Re: [OT] Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Gregory Maxwell
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN James Sutherland
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Gregory Maxwell
- RE: hotmail not dealing with ECN David Schwartz
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN David Lang
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Johannes Erdfelt
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Brian May