On Mon, Aug 11, 2025 at 3:53 PM Sean Christopherson <sea...@google.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 11, 2025, Rick P Edgecombe wrote: > > But Sean, if you want to save some time I think we can just accelerate this > > other reviewing. As far as new-fangled features, having this upstream is > > important even for that, because we are currently having to keep these tests > > plus follow on tests in sync across various development branches. So yea, > > it's > > time to get this over the line. > > Yes please. The unspoken threat in my response is that at some point I will > just > start NAKing KVM TDX patches :-D
I'm making good progress and the massive refactor is mostly complete. I believe I should have the patches ready to review next week. I'm also thinking that it would be easier if I split the series in 2 or possibly 3 patchset. The first one including the setup code and the basic lifecycle test and then the rest of the tests with possibly the guest_memfd tests in a separate series. What do you think?
