On Tue, 12 Aug 2025 22:27:00 +0900 Sang-Heon Jeon <ekffu200...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello, Alexandre
>
> On Tue, Aug 12, 2025 at 9:32 PM Sang-Heon Jeon <ekffu200...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hello, Alexandre
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 12, 2025 at 5:13 PM Alexandre Ghiti <alexgh...@rivosinc.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > _common.sh was recently introduced but is not installed and then
> > > triggers an error when trying to run the damon selftests:
> > >
> > > selftests: damon: sysfs.sh
> > > ./sysfs.sh: line 4: _common.sh: No such file or directory
> > >
> > > Install this file to avoid this error.
> >
> > I tried to reproduce those error with my vm environment but I failed;
> > with my workaround test method, it doesn't exist.
> > If you're okay, could you please tell me line by line how you execute
> > tests in what environment?
> > I'm also struggling with the test environment, as well.
>
> I succeeded to reproduce and also check that this patch removes those errors.
>
> > > Fixes: 511914506d19 ("selftests/damon: introduce _common.sh to host
> > > shared function")
> > > Signed-off-by: Alexandre Ghiti <alexgh...@rivosinc.com>
> > > ---
>
> Tested-by: Sang-Heon Jeon <ekffu200...@gmail.com>
Thank you, Sang-Heon :)
[...]
> > > ---
> > > base-commit: 2754d549af31f8f029f02d02cd8e574676229b3d
> >
> > Does this commit exist in `mm-new` or `damon-next`? I failed to setup
> > the same base-commit environment.
>
> However, I'm still not sure that this patch is in the correct
> baseline. maybe it will not cause any problems with the merge
> though... but I'm not sure. So I didn't add a reviewed-by tag.
I think unclear baseline of a patch shouldn't be a blocker of Reviewed-by tags.
Since most DAMON patches are recommended to use mm-new[1], as long as the patch
can cleanly applied on latest mm-new and you don't see anything wrong, I think
you can assume it is based on mm-new.
[1]
https://origin.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/mm/damon/maintainer-profile.html#scm-trees
Thanks,
SJ
[...]
