2.6.22-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let us
know.

------------------
From: Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

[IPSEC]: Avoid undefined shift operation when testing algorithm ID

[ Upstream commit: f398035f2dec0a6150833b0bc105057953594edb ]

The aalgos/ealgos fields are only 32 bits wide.  However, af_key tries
to test them with the expression 1 << id where id can be as large as
253.  This produces different behaviour on different architectures.

The following patch explicitly checks whether ID is greater than 31
and fails the check if that's the case.

We cannot easily extend the mask to be longer than 32 bits due to
exposure to user-space.  Besides, this whole interface is obsolete
anyway in favour of the xfrm_user interface which doesn't use this
bit mask in templates (well not within the kernel anyway).

Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

---
 net/key/af_key.c |   14 ++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/net/key/af_key.c
+++ b/net/key/af_key.c
@@ -2777,12 +2777,22 @@ static struct sadb_msg *pfkey_get_base_m
 
 static inline int aalg_tmpl_set(struct xfrm_tmpl *t, struct xfrm_algo_desc *d)
 {
-       return t->aalgos & (1 << d->desc.sadb_alg_id);
+       unsigned int id = d->desc.sadb_alg_id;
+
+       if (id >= sizeof(t->aalgos) * 8)
+               return 0;
+
+       return (t->aalgos >> id) & 1;
 }
 
 static inline int ealg_tmpl_set(struct xfrm_tmpl *t, struct xfrm_algo_desc *d)
 {
-       return t->ealgos & (1 << d->desc.sadb_alg_id);
+       unsigned int id = d->desc.sadb_alg_id;
+
+       if (id >= sizeof(t->ealgos) * 8)
+               return 0;
+
+       return (t->ealgos >> id) & 1;
 }
 
 static int count_ah_combs(struct xfrm_tmpl *t)

-- 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to