On Thu, Jul 03, 2025 at 11:39:14AM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote: > On Tue, Jun 10, 2025 at 01:29:46PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > + exit(ret); > Should this be _exit() instead? IIRC exit() does some clean-ups which > are not safe in the vfork'ed child. This test is written to nolibc so that we don't get any of that libc level stuff, but yeah it would be a bit more correct.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
