From: Rong Tao <rong...@cestc.cn>

Within __add_three() function, should use function parameters instead of
global variables. So that the variables groot_nested.inner.root and
groot_nested.inner.glock in rbtree_add_nodes_nested() are tested
correctly.

Signed-off-by: Rong Tao <rong...@cestc.cn>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/rbtree.c | 14 +++++++-------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/rbtree.c 
b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/rbtree.c
index a3620c15c136..49fe93d7e059 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/rbtree.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/rbtree.c
@@ -61,19 +61,19 @@ static long __add_three(struct bpf_rb_root *root, struct 
bpf_spin_lock *lock)
        }
        m->key = 1;
 
-       bpf_spin_lock(&glock);
-       bpf_rbtree_add(&groot, &n->node, less);
-       bpf_rbtree_add(&groot, &m->node, less);
-       bpf_spin_unlock(&glock);
+       bpf_spin_lock(lock);
+       bpf_rbtree_add(root, &n->node, less);
+       bpf_rbtree_add(root, &m->node, less);
+       bpf_spin_unlock(lock);
 
        n = bpf_obj_new(typeof(*n));
        if (!n)
                return 3;
        n->key = 3;
 
-       bpf_spin_lock(&glock);
-       bpf_rbtree_add(&groot, &n->node, less);
-       bpf_spin_unlock(&glock);
+       bpf_spin_lock(lock);
+       bpf_rbtree_add(root, &n->node, less);
+       bpf_spin_unlock(lock);
        return 0;
 }
 
-- 
2.49.0


Reply via email to