On Fri, May 16, 2025 at 09:53:36AM -0700, Song Liu wrote: > On Thu, Apr 10, 2025 at 8:17 AM Petr Mladek <pmla...@suse.com> wrote: > > > [...] > > > > > > [1] > > > https://lore.kernel.org/live-patching/20250127213310.2496133-1-wn...@google.com/ > > > [2] > > > https://lore.kernel.org/live-patching/20250129232936.1795412-1-s...@kernel.org/ > > > [3] https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32589 > > > [4] > > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20241017092538.1859841-1-mark.rutl...@arm.com/ > > > > > > Changes v2 => v3: > > > 1. Remove a redundant check for -ENOENT. (Josh Poimboeuf) > > > 2. Add Tested-by and Acked-by on v1. (I forgot to add them in v2.) > > > > The approach and both patches look reasonable: > > > > Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek <pmla...@suse.com> > > > > Is anyone, Arm people, Mark, against pushing this into linux-next, > > please? > > Ping. > > ARM folks, please share your thoughts on this work. To fully support > livepatching of kernel modules, we also need [1]. We hope we can > land this in the 6.16 kernel.
Hi; apologies for the delay -- my time had been consumed by FPSIMD/SVE/SME fixes and related non-upstream stuff for the last few weeks, and now I'm catching up. For the stacktrace side, I'm happy with enabling this without sframe, and I hase some minor nits which we can either fix up now or as a follow-up. I'll cover those in another reply, and chase up the module / code-patching bit shortly. Mark. > Thanks, > Song > > [1] > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20250412010940.1686376-1-dylanbha...@google.com/
