* Dave Hansen <dave.han...@intel.com> wrote:
> Thanks for sending this, Andrew!
>
> I think I'll probably add a slightly shorter summary:
>
> tl;dr: SGX page reclaim touches the page to copy its contents to
> secondary storage. SGX instructions do not gracefully handle machine
> checks. Despite this, the existing SGX code will try to reclaim pages
> that it _knows_ are poisoned. Avoid even trying to reclaim poisoned pages.
>
> But otherwise it looks great:
>
> Acked-by: Dave Hansen <dave.han...@linux.intel.com>
Thanks, I've applied this fix to tip:x86/sgx, with the TL;DR paragraph
added in.
Thanks,
Ingo
