On 5/10/25 00:54, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
Hi Shuah and Kees,
On 2025-05-05 17:15:18+0200, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
Nolibc is useful for selftests as the test programs can be very small,
and compiled with just a kernel crosscompiler, without userspace support.
Currently nolibc is only usable with kselftest.h, not the more
convenient to use kselftest_harness.h
This series provides this compatibility by removing the usage of problematic
libc features from the harness.
I'd like to get this series into the next merge window.
For that I'd like to expose it to linux-next through the nolibc tree.
If you don't have the time for a review or issues crop up, I will drop
the patches again.
Are you fine with that?
Didn't I respond to v13 saying you can include in your nolibc PR?
If I didn't here is my Reviewed-by.
The issues reported by Mark have been fixed and tests have been written
for them.
Reviewed-by: Shuah Khan <sk...@linuxfoundation.org>
thanks,
-- Shuah
