On 1/29/08, Stefan Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Paolo Ciarrocchi wrote:
> > --- a/arch/x86/math-emu/errors.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/math-emu/errors.c
> > @@ -75,7 +75,8 @@ void FPU_printall(void)
> > FPU_get_user(FPU_modrm, 1 + (u_char __user *) address);
> >
> > if (FPU_modrm >= 0300)
> > - printk(KERN_ERR " %02x (%02x+%d)\n", FPU_modrm, FPU_modrm & 0xf8,
> FPU_modrm & 7);
> > + printk(KERN_ERR " %02x (%02x+%d)\n", FPU_modrm, FPU_modrm & 0xf8,
> > + FPU_modrm & 7);
> > else
> > printk(KERN_ERR " /%d, mod=%d rm=%d\n",
> > (FPU_modrm >> 3) & 7, (FPU_modrm >> 6) & 3, FPU_modrm & 7);
> > @@ -309,7 +310,8 @@ asmlinkage void FPU_exception(int n)
> > printk(KERN_ERR "FPU emulator: Unknown Exception: 0x%04x!\n", n);
> >
> > if (n == EX_INTERNAL) {
> > - printk(KERN_ERR "FPU emulator: Internal error type 0x%04x\n",
> int_type);
> > + printk(KERN_ERR "FPU emulator: Internal error type 0x%04x\n",
> > + int_type);
> > FPU_printall();
> > }
> > #ifdef PRINT_MESSAGES
>
>
> The "fix" is still not conforming to CodingStyle.
>
> Besides, why don't you leave these lines as they are? There is no
> important information hidden behind the 80th column in the existing code.
Yes, you are right.
Ingo, patch 7 deserves to be deleted.
Ciao,
--
Paolo
http://paolo.ciarrocchi.googlepages.com/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
