Ion Badulescu wrote: > > On Sat, 27 Jan 2001 19:19:01 +1100, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > The figures I quoted for the no-hw-checksum case were still > > using scatter/gather. That can be turned off as well and > > it makes it a tiny bit quicker. > > Hmm. Are you sure the differences are not just noise? I don't think so. It's all pretty repeatable. > Unless you > modified the zerocopy patch yourself, it won't use SG without > checksums... I believe it in fact does use SG when hardware tx checksums are unavailable, but this capability wil be removed RSN because userspace can scribble on the pagecache after the checksum has been calculated, and before the frame has hit the wire. - - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- sendfile+zerocopy: fairly sexy (nothing to do with ECN) Andrew Morton
- Re: sendfile+zerocopy: fairly sexy (nothing to do wit... Aaron Lehmann
- Re: sendfile+zerocopy: fairly sexy (nothing to do... Andrew Morton
- Re: sendfile+zerocopy: fairly sexy (nothing t... Ion Badulescu
- Re: sendfile+zerocopy: fairly sexy (nothi... Andrew Morton
- Re: sendfile+zerocopy: fairly sexy (nothing t... David S. Miller
- Re: sendfile+zerocopy: fairly sexy (nothi... David S. Miller
- Re: sendfile+zerocopy: fairly sexy (... David S. Miller
- Re: sendfile+zerocopy: fairly se... David S. Miller
- Re: sendfile+zerocopy: fairly sexy (... David S. Miller
- Re: sendfile+zerocopy: fairly sexy (nothi... Andrew Morton
- Re: sendfile+zerocopy: fairly sexy (... Trond Myklebust
- Re: sendfile+zerocopy: fairly sexy (... David Lang
- Re: sendfile+zerocopy: fairly se... David S. Miller
- Re: sendfile+zerocopy: fairl... David Lang