>
> On Wed, May 07, 2025 at 07:26:05PM +0800, Zqiang wrote:
> > In the preparation stage of CPU online, if the corresponding
> > the rdp's->nocb_cb_kthread does not exist, will be created,
> > there is a situation where the rdp's rcuop kthreads creation fails,
> > and then de-offload this CPU's rdp, does not assign this CPU's
> > rdp->nocb_cb_kthread pointer, but this rdp's->nocb_gp_rdp and
> > rdp's->rdp_gp->nocb_gp_kthread is still valid.
> >
> > This will cause the subsequent re-offload operation of this offline
> > CPU, which will pass the conditional check and the kthread_unpark()
> > will access invalid rdp's->nocb_cb_kthread pointer.
> >
> > This commit therefore use rdp's->nocb_gp_kthread instead of
> > rdp_gp's->nocb_gp_kthread for safety check.
>
> Let's see...
>
> The rcu_nocb_cpu_offload() and rcu_nocb_cpu_deoffload() functions invoke
> cpus_read_lock(), and thus exclude all the CPU-hotplug notifiers,
> including the one that invokes rcutree_prepare_cpu(). There is also
> rcu_spawn_gp_kthread(), but that is an early_initcall() that happens
> before CPU hotplug can happen, at least for non-boot CPUs.
>
> So rcu_spawn_cpu_nocb_kthread() cannot run concurrently with either
> rcu_nocb_cpu_offload() or rcu_nocb_cpu_deoffload(), correct?
Yes, the rcutree_prepare_cpu() is invoked under the cpus_write_lock()
protection.
>
> It appears that all CPUs (try to) create their rcuoc and rcuog kthreads
> when they come online, regardless of the nohz_full and rcu_nocbs kernel
> boot parameters, some old tree_nocb.h comments notwithstanding. ;-) The
> rcu_organize_nocb_kthreads() function looks to cover all CPUs as well,
> so ->nocb_gp_rdp will always be set after very early boot (give or take
> alloc_bootmem_cpumask_var() failure in rcu_nocb_setup() and checked for
> by the cpumask_available() in rcu_organize_nocb_kthreads()).
>
> The rcu_spawn_cpu_nocb_kthread() can fail to spawn the GP kthread,
> in which case both ->nocb_cb_kthread and ->nocb_gp_kthread remain
> NULL.
This is a low probability event, but it is possible, if this happens,
and we test it with rcutorture configured with parameters
nocbs_toggle and onoff_interval, it will trigger a null ptr access.
Thanks
Zqiang
>
> If so, LGTM.
>
> Thanx, Paul
>
> > Signed-off-by: Zqiang <qiang.zhang1...@gmail.com>
> > ---
> > kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h | 5 ++---
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h
> > index 1596812f7f12..6679140bb0b5 100644
> > --- a/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h
> > +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h
> > @@ -1146,7 +1146,6 @@ static bool rcu_nocb_rdp_offload_wait_cond(struct
> > rcu_data *rdp)
> > static int rcu_nocb_rdp_offload(struct rcu_data *rdp)
> > {
> > int wake_gp;
> > - struct rcu_data *rdp_gp = rdp->nocb_gp_rdp;
> >
> > WARN_ON_ONCE(cpu_online(rdp->cpu));
> > /*
> > @@ -1156,7 +1155,7 @@ static int rcu_nocb_rdp_offload(struct rcu_data *rdp)
> > if (!rdp->nocb_gp_rdp)
> > return -EINVAL;
> >
> > - if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!rdp_gp->nocb_gp_kthread))
> > + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!rdp->nocb_gp_kthread))
> > return -EINVAL;
> >
> > pr_info("Offloading %d\n", rdp->cpu);
> > @@ -1166,7 +1165,7 @@ static int rcu_nocb_rdp_offload(struct rcu_data *rdp)
> >
> > wake_gp = rcu_nocb_queue_toggle_rdp(rdp);
> > if (wake_gp)
> > - wake_up_process(rdp_gp->nocb_gp_kthread);
> > + wake_up_process(rdp->nocb_gp_kthread);
> >
> > swait_event_exclusive(rdp->nocb_state_wq,
> > rcu_nocb_rdp_offload_wait_cond(rdp));
> > --
> > 2.17.1
> >
