On Sun, Apr 20, 2025 at 05:48:15PM -0400, Waiman Long <ll...@redhat.com> wrote:
> I was referring to the suggestion that the setting of memory_recursiveprot
> mount option has a material impact of the child 2 test result. Roman
> probably didn't have memory_recursiveprot set when developing this selftest.

The patch in its v7 form is effectively a revert of
        1d09069f5313f ("selftests: memcg: expect no low events in unprotected 
sibling")

i.e. this would be going in circles (that commit is also a revert) hence
I suggested to exempt looking at memory.events:low entirely with
memory_recursiveprot (and check for 0 when !memory_recursiveprot) --
which is something new (and hopefully universally better :-)

Michal

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to