On Mon, Apr 14, 2025 at 12:08:35PM +0700, Bui Quang Minh wrote:
> When pausing rx (e.g. set up xdp, xsk pool, rx resize), we call
> napi_disable() on the receive queue's napi. In delayed refill_work, it
> also calls napi_disable() on the receive queue's napi.  When
> napi_disable() is called on an already disabled napi, it will sleep in
> napi_disable_locked while still holding the netdev_lock. As a result,
> later napi_enable gets stuck too as it cannot acquire the netdev_lock.
> This leads to refill_work and the pause-then-resume tx are stuck
> altogether.
> 
> This scenario can be reproducible by binding a XDP socket to virtio-net
> interface without setting up the fill ring. As a result, try_fill_recv
> will fail until the fill ring is set up and refill_work is scheduled.
> 
> This commit adds virtnet_rx_(pause/resume)_all helpers and fixes up the
> virtnet_rx_resume to disable future and cancel all inflights delayed
> refill_work before calling napi_disable() to pause the rx.
> 
> Fixes: 413f0271f396 ("net: protect NAPI enablement with netdev_lock()")
> Signed-off-by: Bui Quang Minh <minhquangbu...@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 60 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 51 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)


Thans for the patch! Yes something to improve:

> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> index 7e4617216a4b..4361b91ccc64 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> @@ -3342,10 +3342,53 @@ static netdev_tx_t start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, 
> struct net_device *dev)
>       return NETDEV_TX_OK;
>  }
>  
> +static void virtnet_rx_pause_all(struct virtnet_info *vi)
> +{
> +     bool running = netif_running(vi->dev);
> +
> +     /*
> +      * Make sure refill_work does not run concurrently to
> +      * avoid napi_disable race which leads to deadlock.
> +      */
> +     disable_delayed_refill(vi);
> +     cancel_delayed_work_sync(&vi->refill);
> +     if (running) {
> +             int i;
> +
> +             for (i = 0; i < vi->max_queue_pairs; i++) {
> +                     virtnet_napi_disable(&vi->rq[i]);
> +                     virtnet_cancel_dim(vi, &vi->rq[i].dim);

duplicates a bit of code from virtnet_rx_pause_all.


> +             }
> +     }
> +}
> +
> +static void virtnet_rx_resume_all(struct virtnet_info *vi)
> +{
> +     bool running = netif_running(vi->dev);
> +     int i;
> +
> +     enable_delayed_refill(vi);
> +     for (i = 0; i < vi->max_queue_pairs; i++) {
> +             if (i < vi->curr_queue_pairs) {
> +                     if (!try_fill_recv(vi, &vi->rq[i], GFP_KERNEL))
> +                             schedule_delayed_work(&vi->refill, 0);
> +             }
> +
> +             if (running)
> +                     virtnet_napi_enable(&vi->rq[i]);
> +     }
> +}
> +
>  static void virtnet_rx_pause(struct virtnet_info *vi, struct receive_queue 
> *rq)
>  {
>       bool running = netif_running(vi->dev);
>  
> +     /*
> +      * Make sure refill_work does not run concurrently to
> +      * avoid napi_disable race which leads to deadlock.
> +      */
> +     disable_delayed_refill(vi);
> +     cancel_delayed_work_sync(&vi->refill);


Maybe rename this e.g. __virtnet_rx_pause ?


>       if (running) {
>               virtnet_napi_disable(rq);
>               virtnet_cancel_dim(vi, &rq->dim);
> @@ -3356,6 +3399,7 @@ static void virtnet_rx_resume(struct virtnet_info *vi, 
> struct receive_queue *rq)
>  {
>       bool running = netif_running(vi->dev);
>  
> +     enable_delayed_refill(vi);
>       if (!try_fill_recv(vi, rq, GFP_KERNEL))
>               schedule_delayed_work(&vi->refill, 0);
>  
> @@ -5959,12 +6003,12 @@ static int virtnet_xdp_set(struct net_device *dev, 
> struct bpf_prog *prog,
>       if (prog)
>               bpf_prog_add(prog, vi->max_queue_pairs - 1);
>  
> +     virtnet_rx_pause_all(vi);
> +
>       /* Make sure NAPI is not using any XDP TX queues for RX. */
>       if (netif_running(dev)) {
> -             for (i = 0; i < vi->max_queue_pairs; i++) {
> -                     virtnet_napi_disable(&vi->rq[i]);
> +             for (i = 0; i < vi->max_queue_pairs; i++)
>                       virtnet_napi_tx_disable(&vi->sq[i]);
> -             }
>       }
>  
>       if (!prog) {
> @@ -5996,13 +6040,12 @@ static int virtnet_xdp_set(struct net_device *dev, 
> struct bpf_prog *prog,
>               vi->xdp_enabled = false;
>       }
>  
> +     virtnet_rx_resume_all(vi);
>       for (i = 0; i < vi->max_queue_pairs; i++) {
>               if (old_prog)
>                       bpf_prog_put(old_prog);
> -             if (netif_running(dev)) {
> -                     virtnet_napi_enable(&vi->rq[i]);
> +             if (netif_running(dev))
>                       virtnet_napi_tx_enable(&vi->sq[i]);
> -             }
>       }
>  
>       return 0;
> @@ -6014,11 +6057,10 @@ static int virtnet_xdp_set(struct net_device *dev, 
> struct bpf_prog *prog,
>                       rcu_assign_pointer(vi->rq[i].xdp_prog, old_prog);
>       }
>  
> +     virtnet_rx_resume_all(vi);
>       if (netif_running(dev)) {
> -             for (i = 0; i < vi->max_queue_pairs; i++) {
> -                     virtnet_napi_enable(&vi->rq[i]);
> +             for (i = 0; i < vi->max_queue_pairs; i++)
>                       virtnet_napi_tx_enable(&vi->sq[i]);
> -             }
>       }
>       if (prog)
>               bpf_prog_sub(prog, vi->max_queue_pairs - 1);
> -- 
> 2.43.0


Reply via email to