> > On Tue, Apr 08, 2025 at 06:54:14AM +0000, Reshetova, Elena wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 08, 2025 at 09:40:14AM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > > > On Tue, Apr 08, 2025 at 12:06:32AM +0000, Huang, Kai wrote: > > > > > On Mon, 2025-04-07 at 08:23 +0000, Reshetova, Elena wrote: > > > > > > > On Fri, Apr 04, 2025 at 06:53:17AM +0000, Reshetova, Elena wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Apr 02, 2025 at 01:11:25PM +0000, Reshetova, Elena > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > current SGX kernel code does not handle such errors in > any > > > other > > > > > > > way > > > > > > > > > > > > than notifying that operation failed for other ENCLS > leaves. So, > > > I don't > > > > > > > > > > > > see why ENCLS[EUPDATESVN] should be different from > > > existing > > > > > > > > > behaviour? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > While not disagreeing fully (it depends on call site), in > > > > > > > > > > > some > > > > > > > > > > > situations it is more difficult to take more preventive > actions. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This is a situation where we know that there are *zero* > > > > > > > > > > > EPC > > > pages in > > > > > > > > > > > traffic so it is relatively easy to stop the madness, > > > > > > > > > > > isn't it? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I guess the best action would be make sgx_alloc_epc_page() > > > return > > > > > > > > > > > consistently -ENOMEM, if the unexpected happens. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > But this would be very misleading imo. We do have memory, > > > even page > > > > > > > > > > allocation might function as normal in EPC, the only thing > > > > > > > > > > that > is > > > broken > > > > > > > > > > can be EUPDATESVN functionality. Returning -ENOMEM in > this > > > case > > > > > > > seems > > > > > > > > > > wrong. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This makes it not misleading at all: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > pr_err("EUPDATESVN: unknown error %d\n", ret); > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Since hardware should never return this, it indicates a kernel > bug. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > OK, so you propose in this case to print the above message, > > > sgx_updatesvn > > > > > > > > returning an error, and then NULL from > > > __sgx_alloc_epc_page_from_node > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > the __sgx_alloc_epc_page returning -ENOMEM after an iteration > > > over > > > > > > > > a whole set of numa nodes given that we will keep getting the > > > unknown > > > > > > > error > > > > > > > > on each node upon trying to do an allocation from each one? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'd disable ioctl's in this case and return -ENOMEM. It's a cheap > sanity > > > > > > > check. Should not ever happen, but if e.g., a new kernel patch > breaks > > > > > > > anything, it could help catching issues. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > We are talking here about situation that is never expected to > happen > > > so I > > > > > > > don't think it is too heavy hammer here. Here it makes sense > because > > > not > > > > > > > much effort is required to implement the counter-measures. > > > > > > > > > > > > OK, but does it really make sense to explicitly disable ioctls? > > > > > > Note that everything *in practice* will be disabled simply because > not a > > > single page > > > > > > anymore can be allocated from EPC since we are getting -ENOMEM > on > > > EPC > > > > > > page allocation. Also, note that any approach we chose should be > > > symmetrical > > > > > > to SGX virtualization side also, which doesn´t use ioctls at all. > > > > > > Simply > > > returning > > > > > > -ENOMEM for page allocation in EPC seems like a correct > symmetrical > > > solution > > > > > > that would work for both nativel enclaves and EPC pages allocated > for > > > VMs. > > > > > > And nothing would be able to proceed creating/managing enclaves > at > > > this point. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Right, failing ioctls() doesn't cover SGX virtualization. If we ever > > > > > want > to > > > > > fail, we should fail the EPC allocation. > > > > > > > > "I guess the best action would be make sgx_alloc_epc_page() return > > > > consistently -ENOMEM, if the unexpected happens." -me > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Btw, for the unknown error, and any other errors which should not > > > happen, > > > > > couldn't we use the ENCLS_WARN()? AFAICT there are already cases > that > > > we are > > > > > using ENCLS_WARN() for those "impossible-to-happen-errors". > > > > Ok, so to summarise the approach I will be sending in the next version: > > > > In case unknown error returns, issue ENCLS_WARN (uses WARN_ON > underneath) > > and return -ENOMEM from EPC page allocation. No other explicit ioctl > disabling needed > > since nothing can proceed anyhow if we cannot allocate a page from EPC. > > > > Does this sound right? > > I think it should be sufficient (not a review tho).
Sounds good, thank you! I will respin a new version soon. Best Regards, Elena.