On Mon, Apr 07, 2025 at 08:47:05PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote: > > In my opinion, it makes the most sense to keep the spec as it is and > > change QEMU and the kernel to match, but obviously that's not trivial > > to do in a way that doesn't break existing devices and drivers. > > If only it would be limited to QEMU and Linux ... :) > > Out of curiosity, assuming we'd make the spec match the current QEMU/Linux > implementation at least for the 3 involved features only, would there be a > way to adjust crossvm without any disruption? > > I still have the feeling that it will be rather hard to get that all > implementations match the spec ... For new features+queues it will be easy > to force the usage of fixed virtqueue numbers, but for free-page-hinting and > reporting, it's a mess :(
Still thinking about a way to fix drivers... We can discuss this theoretically, maybe? -- MST
