On Mon, Mar 24, 2025 at 04:55:13PM +0100, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 24, 2025 at 03:03:17PM +0100, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> > s390 does not provide a hwcap.h UAPI header.
> >
> > Add an inline definition for the constant HWCAP_S390_VXRS until a proper
> > UAPI header is introduced.
> >
> > Fixes: 210860e7f733 ("selftests: vDSO: check cpu caps before running chacha
> > test")
> > Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <thomas.weisssc...@linutronix.de>
> > ---
> > tools/testing/selftests/vDSO/vdso_test_chacha.c | 3 +++
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/vDSO/vdso_test_chacha.c
> > b/tools/testing/selftests/vDSO/vdso_test_chacha.c
> > index
> > fd5c5108b42f04ec459d39b74f33edc2ceafbba1..0ce5189718ce35b0a4d69b71559db8379b598b93
> > 100644
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/vDSO/vdso_test_chacha.c
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/vDSO/vdso_test_chacha.c
> > @@ -19,6 +19,9 @@ static bool cpu_has_capabilities(void)
> > return getauxval(AT_HWCAP) & HWCAP_ASIMD;
> > }
> > #elif defined(__s390x__)
> > +#ifndef HWCAP_S390_VXRS
> > +#define HWCAP_S390_VXRS (1 << 11)
> > +#endif
> > static bool cpu_has_capabilities(void)
> > {
> > return getauxval(AT_HWCAP) & HWCAP_S390_VXRS;
>
> How did this cause a problem?
>
> Did you use something different than glibc(-devel) on your test
> system? Just wondering since glibc-devel provides the define since
> ages and is also required for getauxval().
I used nolibc (from the kernel tree at tools/include/nolibc/) to make cross
platform usage of the tests easier. See also [0].
I got confused by the existence of hwcap.h in the kernel UAPI headers for
various architectures and didn't check the libc headers.
So this isn't really a bug right now, and the hwcap changes will only really be
necessary once my other work goes upstream.
[0]
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20250217-kunit-kselftests-v1-0-42b4524c3...@linutronix.de/
