Hello all:

This sereis tries to implement the VIRTIO_F_IN_ORDER to
virtio_ring. This is done by introducing virtqueue ops so we can
implement separate helpers for different virtqueue layout/features
then the in-order were implmeented on top.

Tests shows 5% imporvemnt in RX PPS with KVM guest + testpmd on the
host.

Please review.

Thanks

Jason Wang (19):
  virtio_ring: rename virtqueue_reinit_xxx to virtqueue_reset_xxx()
  virtio_ring: switch to use vring_virtqueue in virtqueue_poll variants
  virtio_ring: unify logic of virtqueue_poll() and more_used()
  virtio_ring: switch to use vring_virtqueue for virtqueue resize
    variants
  virtio_ring: switch to use vring_virtqueue for virtqueue_kick_prepare
    variants
  virtio_ring: switch to use vring_virtqueue for virtqueue_add variants
  virtio: switch to use vring_virtqueue for virtqueue_add variants
  virtio_ring: switch to use vring_virtqueue for enable_cb_prepare
    variants
  virtio_ring: use vring_virtqueue for enable_cb_delayed variants
  virtio_ring: switch to use vring_virtqueue for disable_cb variants
  virtio_ring: switch to use vring_virtqueue for detach_unused_buf
    variants
  virtio_ring: use u16 for last_used_idx in virtqueue_poll_split()
  virtio_ring: introduce virtqueue ops
  virtio_ring: determine descriptor flags at one time
  virtio_ring: factor out core logic of buffer detaching
  virtio_ring: factor out core logic for updating last_used_idx
  virtio_ring: move next_avail_idx to vring_virtqueue
  virtio_ring: factor out split indirect detaching logic
  virtio_ring: add in order support

 drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c | 856 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 653 insertions(+), 203 deletions(-)

-- 
2.42.0


Reply via email to