Hello all: This sereis tries to implement the VIRTIO_F_IN_ORDER to virtio_ring. This is done by introducing virtqueue ops so we can implement separate helpers for different virtqueue layout/features then the in-order were implmeented on top.
Tests shows 5% imporvemnt in RX PPS with KVM guest + testpmd on the host. Please review. Thanks Jason Wang (19): virtio_ring: rename virtqueue_reinit_xxx to virtqueue_reset_xxx() virtio_ring: switch to use vring_virtqueue in virtqueue_poll variants virtio_ring: unify logic of virtqueue_poll() and more_used() virtio_ring: switch to use vring_virtqueue for virtqueue resize variants virtio_ring: switch to use vring_virtqueue for virtqueue_kick_prepare variants virtio_ring: switch to use vring_virtqueue for virtqueue_add variants virtio: switch to use vring_virtqueue for virtqueue_add variants virtio_ring: switch to use vring_virtqueue for enable_cb_prepare variants virtio_ring: use vring_virtqueue for enable_cb_delayed variants virtio_ring: switch to use vring_virtqueue for disable_cb variants virtio_ring: switch to use vring_virtqueue for detach_unused_buf variants virtio_ring: use u16 for last_used_idx in virtqueue_poll_split() virtio_ring: introduce virtqueue ops virtio_ring: determine descriptor flags at one time virtio_ring: factor out core logic of buffer detaching virtio_ring: factor out core logic for updating last_used_idx virtio_ring: move next_avail_idx to vring_virtqueue virtio_ring: factor out split indirect detaching logic virtio_ring: add in order support drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c | 856 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------- 1 file changed, 653 insertions(+), 203 deletions(-) -- 2.42.0