On Thu, 2025-03-20 at 15:19 +0100, Halil Pasic wrote: > On Thu, 20 Mar 2025 15:09:57 +0100 > Halil Pasic <pa...@linux.ibm.com> wrote: > > > > I already implemented it in my patch v2 (just waiting for Amit to > > > confirm the new commit message). But if you want to split it you > > > can > > > create a seperate patch for it as well (I don't really mind > > > either > > > way). > > > > > Your v2 has not been posted yet, or? I can't find it in my Inbox. > > I understand that you have confirmed that the byte order handling is > needed but missing, right?
Yes, I wanted to first hear back from Amit whether he liked the new commit message, but seeing as he hasn't yet replied I'll just post it now. I've confirmed that the endianness handling is necessary, but not implementated. I've looked all the way down into hvc_console() up until tty_do_resize(), but there are no endianess adjustments up until that point aka I'm pretty certain the endianness is broken. I'll post my v2 without the endianness fix then > > > > > It is conceptually a different bug and warrants a patch and a > > commit > > message of its own. At least IMHO.
