On Thu, Mar 20, 2025 at 1:54 AM Dongli Zhang <dongli.zh...@oracle.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Jason,
>
> On 3/17/25 5:48 PM, Jason Wang wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 18, 2025 at 7:52 AM Dongli Zhang <dongli.zh...@oracle.com> 
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Although the support of VIRTIO_F_ANY_LAYOUT + VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1 was
> >> signaled by the commit 664ed90e621c ("vhost/scsi: Set
> >> VIRTIO_F_ANY_LAYOUT + VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1 feature bits"),
> >> vhost_scsi_send_bad_target() still assumes the response in a single
> >> descriptor.
> >>
> >> Similar issue in vhost_scsi_send_bad_target() has been fixed in previous
> >> commit.
> >>
> >> Fixes: 3ca51662f818 ("vhost-scsi: Add better resource allocation failure 
> >> handling")
> >
> > And
> >
> > 6dd88fd59da84631b5fe5c8176931c38cfa3b265 ("vhost-scsi: unbreak any
> > layout for response")
> >
>
> Would suggest add the commit to Fixes?
>
> vhost_scsi_send_status() has been introduced by the most recent patch.
>
> It isn't related to that commit. That commit is to fix
> vhost_scsi_complete_cmd_work()
>
> Or would you suggest mention it as part of "Similar issue has been fixed in
> previous commit."?

I'm fine with either, they are all fixes for any header layout anyhow.

Thanks

>
> Thank you very much!
>
> Dongli Zhang
>


Reply via email to