On Thu, Mar 20, 2025 at 1:54 AM Dongli Zhang <dongli.zh...@oracle.com> wrote: > > Hi Jason, > > On 3/17/25 5:48 PM, Jason Wang wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 18, 2025 at 7:52 AM Dongli Zhang <dongli.zh...@oracle.com> > > wrote: > >> > >> Although the support of VIRTIO_F_ANY_LAYOUT + VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1 was > >> signaled by the commit 664ed90e621c ("vhost/scsi: Set > >> VIRTIO_F_ANY_LAYOUT + VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1 feature bits"), > >> vhost_scsi_send_bad_target() still assumes the response in a single > >> descriptor. > >> > >> Similar issue in vhost_scsi_send_bad_target() has been fixed in previous > >> commit. > >> > >> Fixes: 3ca51662f818 ("vhost-scsi: Add better resource allocation failure > >> handling") > > > > And > > > > 6dd88fd59da84631b5fe5c8176931c38cfa3b265 ("vhost-scsi: unbreak any > > layout for response") > > > > Would suggest add the commit to Fixes? > > vhost_scsi_send_status() has been introduced by the most recent patch. > > It isn't related to that commit. That commit is to fix > vhost_scsi_complete_cmd_work() > > Or would you suggest mention it as part of "Similar issue has been fixed in > previous commit."?
I'm fine with either, they are all fixes for any header layout anyhow. Thanks > > Thank you very much! > > Dongli Zhang >