* Martin Schwidefsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-01-30 at 22:53 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > * [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Change s390 percpu.h to use asm-generic/percpu.h
> >
> > do the s390 maintainer agree with this change (Acks please), and has it
> > been tested on s390?
>
> Now I'm confused. The patch has been acked a few weeks ago and the
> last 5+ version of the patch had the acked line. The lastest version
> dropped it for a reason I don't know. And more, the patch is already
> upstream with the (correct) acked line, see git commit
> f034347470e486835ccdcd7a5bb2ceb417be11c4. So, what is the problem ?
the latest patch was sent without your acked line and i asked about
that. But later on Mike told me that you acked it - so i restored the
ack and the patch, Linus pulled the fixes and it now all is upstream and
all architectures should be fine again now.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
