On Fri, Feb 28, 2025 at 11:06:35PM +0530, Dev Jain wrote: > Taking a cursory look at the test, it creates three threads for each cpu. > The bounding of the variable is fine but that being the reason to rename the > variable is not making sense to me.
Hmm yeah the name needs to be more abstract. Do you think nr_workers would be confusing? Or even just "parallelism" or nr_parallel? Or any other ideas? FWIW I briefly looked at just cleaning this up to remove the global variable but that's a bigger time investment than I can afford here I think. (The local variable in stress() would still need a better name anyway). Thanks for the review BTW!
