Hi Louis, On 2025-03-02 20:25:23+0000, Louis Taylor wrote: > openat is useful to avoid needing to construct relative paths, so expose > a wrapper for using it directly.
Can you say what you are using nolibc for? I'm curious :-) > Signed-off-by: Louis Taylor <lo...@kragniz.eu> > --- > tools/include/nolibc/sys.h | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++ > tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c | 22 +++++++++++++++ > 2 files changed, 51 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/tools/include/nolibc/sys.h b/tools/include/nolibc/sys.h > index 8f44c33b1213..e5ff34df4aee 100644 > --- a/tools/include/nolibc/sys.h > +++ b/tools/include/nolibc/sys.h > @@ -765,6 +765,35 @@ int mount(const char *src, const char *tgt, > return __sysret(sys_mount(src, tgt, fst, flags, data)); > } > > +/* > + * int openat(int dirfd, const char *path, int flags[, mode_t mode]); > + */ > + > +static __attribute__((unused)) > +int sys_openat(int dirfd, const char *path, int flags, mode_t mode) > +{ > +#ifdef __NR_openat > + return my_syscall4(__NR_openat, dirfd, path, flags, mode); > +#else > + return __nolibc_enosys(__func__, dirfd, path, flags, mode); > +#endif All architectures support openat(), so the #else could be dropped. > +} > + > +static __attribute__((unused)) > +int openat(int dirfd, const char *path, int flags, ...) > +{ > + mode_t mode = 0; > + > + if (flags & O_CREAT) { > + va_list args; > + > + va_start(args, flags); > + mode = va_arg(args, int); mode_t instead of int? > + va_end(args); > + } > + > + return __sysret(sys_openat(dirfd, path, flags, mode)); > +} > > /* > * int open(const char *path, int flags[, mode_t mode]); > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c > b/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c > index 79c3e6a845f3..97ded6c76f99 100644 > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c > @@ -1028,6 +1028,26 @@ int test_rlimit(void) > return 0; > } > > +int test_openat(void) static. > +{ > + int dev; > + int null; > + > + dev = openat(AT_FDCWD, "/dev", O_DIRECTORY); > + if (dev < 0) > + return -1; > + > + null = openat(dev, "null", 0); > + if (null < 0) { > + close(dev); > + return -1; > + } > + > + close(dev); > + close(null); > + > + return 0; > +} > > /* Run syscall tests between IDs <min> and <max>. > * Return 0 on success, non-zero on failure. > @@ -1116,6 +1136,8 @@ int run_syscall(int min, int max) > CASE_TEST(mmap_munmap_good); EXPECT_SYSZR(1, > test_mmap_munmap()); break; > CASE_TEST(open_tty); EXPECT_SYSNE(1, tmp = > open("/dev/null", 0), -1); if (tmp != -1) close(tmp); break; > CASE_TEST(open_blah); EXPECT_SYSER(1, tmp = > open("/proc/self/blah", 0), -1, ENOENT); if (tmp != -1) close(tmp); break; > + CASE_TEST(openat_fdcwd); EXPECT_SYSNE(1, tmp = > openat(AT_FDCWD, "/dev/null", 0), -1); if (tmp != -1) close(tmp); break; AT_FDCWD is already used in test_openat(). What additional value does the test above add? > + CASE_TEST(openat_dir); EXPECT_SYSNE(1, test_openat(), > -1); break; > CASE_TEST(pipe); EXPECT_SYSZR(1, test_pipe()); > break; > CASE_TEST(poll_null); EXPECT_SYSZR(1, poll(NULL, 0, > 0)); break; > CASE_TEST(poll_stdout); EXPECT_SYSNE(1, ({ struct pollfd > fds = { 1, POLLOUT, 0}; poll(&fds, 1, 0); }), -1); break; > -- > 2.45.2 >