Kevin Krakauer wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 27, 2025 at 11:20:15AM -0500, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> > > ---
> > > tools/testing/selftests/net/gro.sh | 3 ++-
> > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/gro.sh
> > > b/tools/testing/selftests/net/gro.sh
> > > index 02c21ff4ca81..aabd6e5480b8 100755
> > > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/gro.sh
> > > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/gro.sh
> > > @@ -100,5 +100,6 @@ trap cleanup EXIT
> > > if [[ "${test}" == "all" ]]; then
> > > run_all_tests
> > > else
> > > - run_test "${proto}" "${test}"
> > > + exit_code=$(run_test "${proto}" "${test}")
> > > + exit $exit_code
> > > fi;
> >
> > This is due to run_test ending with echo ${exit_code}, which itself
> > always succeeds. Rather than the actual exit_code of the process it
> > ran, right?
> >
> > It looks a bit odd, but this is always how run_all_tests uses
> > run_test.
>
> Yep. I could change this to use exit codes and $? if that's desirable,
> but IME using echo to return is fairly common.
Thanks. No need to change it.
