On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 12:25:05PM -0800, Atish Patra wrote:
> The PMU test commandline option takes an argument to disable a
> certain test. The initial assumption behind this was a common use case
> is just to run all the test most of the time. However, running a single
> test seems more useful instead. Especially, the overflow test has been
> helpful to validate PMU virtualizaiton interrupt changes.
>
> Switching the command line option to run a single test instead
> of disabling a single test also allows to provide additional
> test specific arguments to the test. The default without any options
> remains unchanged which continues to run all the tests.
>
> Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <ati...@rivosinc.com>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/kvm/riscv/sbi_pmu_test.c | 40
> +++++++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/riscv/sbi_pmu_test.c
> b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/riscv/sbi_pmu_test.c
> index 284bc80193bd..533b76d0de82 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/riscv/sbi_pmu_test.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/riscv/sbi_pmu_test.c
> @@ -39,7 +39,11 @@ static bool illegal_handler_invoked;
> #define SBI_PMU_TEST_SNAPSHOT BIT(2)
> #define SBI_PMU_TEST_OVERFLOW BIT(3)
>
> -static int disabled_tests;
> +struct test_args {
> + int disabled_tests;
> +};
> +
> +static struct test_args targs;
>
> unsigned long pmu_csr_read_num(int csr_num)
> {
> @@ -604,7 +608,11 @@ static void test_vm_events_overflow(void *guest_code)
> vcpu_init_vector_tables(vcpu);
> /* Initialize guest timer frequency. */
> timer_freq = vcpu_get_reg(vcpu, RISCV_TIMER_REG(frequency));
> +
> + /* Export the shared variables to the guest */
> sync_global_to_guest(vm, timer_freq);
> + sync_global_to_guest(vm, vcpu_shared_irq_count);
> + sync_global_to_guest(vm, targs);
>
> run_vcpu(vcpu);
>
> @@ -613,28 +621,30 @@ static void test_vm_events_overflow(void *guest_code)
>
> static void test_print_help(char *name)
> {
> - pr_info("Usage: %s [-h] [-d <test name>]\n", name);
> - pr_info("\t-d: Test to disable. Available tests are 'basic', 'events',
> 'snapshot', 'overflow'\n");
> + pr_info("Usage: %s [-h] [-t <test name>]\n", name);
> + pr_info("\t-t: Test to run (default all). Available tests are 'basic',
> 'events', 'snapshot', 'overflow'\n");
It's probably fine to drop '-d', since we don't make any claims about
support, but doing so does risk breaking some CI somewhere. If that
potential breakage is a concern, then we could keep '-d', since nothing
stops us from having both.
> pr_info("\t-h: print this help screen\n");
> }
>
> static bool parse_args(int argc, char *argv[])
> {
> int opt;
> -
> - while ((opt = getopt(argc, argv, "hd:")) != -1) {
> + int temp_disabled_tests = SBI_PMU_TEST_BASIC | SBI_PMU_TEST_EVENTS |
> SBI_PMU_TEST_SNAPSHOT |
> + SBI_PMU_TEST_OVERFLOW;
> + while ((opt = getopt(argc, argv, "h:t:n:")) != -1) {
'-h' doesn't need an argument and '-n' should be introduced with the next
patch.
> switch (opt) {
> - case 'd':
> + case 't':
> if (!strncmp("basic", optarg, 5))
> - disabled_tests |= SBI_PMU_TEST_BASIC;
> + temp_disabled_tests &= ~SBI_PMU_TEST_BASIC;
> else if (!strncmp("events", optarg, 6))
> - disabled_tests |= SBI_PMU_TEST_EVENTS;
> + temp_disabled_tests &= ~SBI_PMU_TEST_EVENTS;
> else if (!strncmp("snapshot", optarg, 8))
> - disabled_tests |= SBI_PMU_TEST_SNAPSHOT;
> + temp_disabled_tests &= ~SBI_PMU_TEST_SNAPSHOT;
> else if (!strncmp("overflow", optarg, 8))
> - disabled_tests |= SBI_PMU_TEST_OVERFLOW;
> + temp_disabled_tests &= ~SBI_PMU_TEST_OVERFLOW;
> else
> goto done;
> + targs.disabled_tests = temp_disabled_tests;
> break;
> case 'h':
> default:
> @@ -650,25 +660,27 @@ static bool parse_args(int argc, char *argv[])
>
> int main(int argc, char *argv[])
> {
> + targs.disabled_tests = 0;
> +
> if (!parse_args(argc, argv))
> exit(KSFT_SKIP);
>
> - if (!(disabled_tests & SBI_PMU_TEST_BASIC)) {
> + if (!(targs.disabled_tests & SBI_PMU_TEST_BASIC)) {
> test_vm_basic_test(test_pmu_basic_sanity);
> pr_info("SBI PMU basic test : PASS\n");
> }
>
> - if (!(disabled_tests & SBI_PMU_TEST_EVENTS)) {
> + if (!(targs.disabled_tests & SBI_PMU_TEST_EVENTS)) {
> test_vm_events_test(test_pmu_events);
> pr_info("SBI PMU event verification test : PASS\n");
> }
>
> - if (!(disabled_tests & SBI_PMU_TEST_SNAPSHOT)) {
> + if (!(targs.disabled_tests & SBI_PMU_TEST_SNAPSHOT)) {
> test_vm_events_snapshot_test(test_pmu_events_snaphost);
> pr_info("SBI PMU event verification with snapshot test :
> PASS\n");
> }
>
> - if (!(disabled_tests & SBI_PMU_TEST_OVERFLOW)) {
> + if (!(targs.disabled_tests & SBI_PMU_TEST_OVERFLOW)) {
> test_vm_events_overflow(test_pmu_events_overflow);
> pr_info("SBI PMU event verification with overflow test :
> PASS\n");
> }
>
> --
> 2.43.0
>
Otherwise,
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajo...@ventanamicro.com>
