Setup the maple_node_cache with percpu sheaves of size 32 to hopefully
improve its performance. Change the single node rcu freeing in
ma_free_rcu() to use kfree_rcu() instead of the custom callback, which
allows the rcu_free sheaf batching to be used. Note there are other
users of mt_free_rcu() where larger parts of maple tree are submitted to
call_rcu() as a whole, and that cannot use the rcu_free sheaf, but it's
still possible for maple nodes freed this way to be reused via the barn,
even if only some cpus are allowed to process rcu callbacks.
Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vba...@suse.cz>
---
lib/maple_tree.c | 11 ++++++++---
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/maple_tree.c b/lib/maple_tree.c
index
f7153ade1be5f16423f0ca073846a7f3dfa60523..56e7a00f6f0941bff163091c999a873e4273f071
100644
--- a/lib/maple_tree.c
+++ b/lib/maple_tree.c
@@ -208,7 +208,7 @@ static void mt_free_rcu(struct rcu_head *head)
static void ma_free_rcu(struct maple_node *node)
{
WARN_ON(node->parent != ma_parent_ptr(node));
- call_rcu(&node->rcu, mt_free_rcu);
+ kfree_rcu(node, rcu);
}
static void mas_set_height(struct ma_state *mas)
@@ -6258,9 +6258,14 @@ bool mas_nomem(struct ma_state *mas, gfp_t gfp)
void __init maple_tree_init(void)
{
+ struct kmem_cache_args args = {
+ .align = sizeof(struct maple_node),
+ .sheaf_capacity = 32,
+ };
+
maple_node_cache = kmem_cache_create("maple_node",
- sizeof(struct maple_node), sizeof(struct maple_node),
- SLAB_PANIC, NULL);
+ sizeof(struct maple_node), &args,
+ SLAB_PANIC);
}
/**
--
2.48.1
