On Wed, 12 Feb 2025 11:41:38 +0000,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpen...@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 11:36:31AM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > For the crash at hand, which clearly shows nVHE, can you report
> > whether the following hack fixes it for you?
> >
> > M.
>
> No luck, I'm afraid. It still crashes the same way.
Right. It was one level deeper. The following change fixes it for
me. YMMV.
M.
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/switch.h
b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/switch.h
index f838a45665f26..b899d815d272f 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/switch.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/switch.h
@@ -501,9 +501,22 @@ static inline bool handle_tx2_tvm(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
return true;
}
+/* Open-coded version of timer_get_offset() to allow for kern_hyp_va() */
+static inline u64 hyp_timer_get_offset(struct arch_timer_context *ctxt)
+{
+ u64 offset = 0;
+
+ if (ctxt->offset.vm_offset)
+ offset += *kern_hyp_va(ctxt->offset.vm_offset);
+ if (ctxt->offset.vcpu_offset)
+ offset += *kern_hyp_va(ctxt->offset.vcpu_offset);
+
+ return offset;
+}
+
static inline u64 compute_counter_value(struct arch_timer_context *ctxt)
{
- return arch_timer_read_cntpct_el0() - timer_get_offset(ctxt);
+ return arch_timer_read_cntpct_el0() - hyp_timer_get_offset(ctxt);
}
static bool kvm_handle_cntxct(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
