Hi Tamir, kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Tamir-Duberstein/ww_mutex-convert-self-test-to-KUnit/20250211-000245 base: a64dcfb451e254085a7daee5fe51bf22959d52d3 patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250210-ww_mutex-kunit-convert-v1-1-972f0201f71e%40gmail.com patch subject: [PATCH] ww_mutex: convert self-test to KUnit config: i386-randconfig-141-20250212 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250212/202502121806.cs6r741y-...@intel.com/config) compiler: clang version 19.1.3 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project ab51eccf88f5321e7c60591c5546b254b6afab99) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot <l...@intel.com> | Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpen...@linaro.org> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/202502121806.cs6r741y-...@intel.com/ smatch warnings: kernel/locking/ww_mutex_kunit.c:238 test_abba_gen_params() warn: shift has higher precedence than mask kernel/locking/ww_mutex_kunit.c:249 test_abba() warn: shift has higher precedence than mask vim +238 kernel/locking/ww_mutex_kunit.c 70207686e492fb kernel/locking/test-ww_mutex.c Chris Wilson 2016-12-01 231 daf92a37bd1117 kernel/locking/ww_mutex_kunit.c Tamir Duberstein 2025-02-10 232 static const void *test_abba_gen_params(const void *prev, char *desc) daf92a37bd1117 kernel/locking/ww_mutex_kunit.c Tamir Duberstein 2025-02-10 233 { daf92a37bd1117 kernel/locking/ww_mutex_kunit.c Tamir Duberstein 2025-02-10 234 static unsigned int storage; daf92a37bd1117 kernel/locking/ww_mutex_kunit.c Tamir Duberstein 2025-02-10 235 const unsigned int *next = gen_range(&storage, 0b00, 0b11, prev); daf92a37bd1117 kernel/locking/ww_mutex_kunit.c Tamir Duberstein 2025-02-10 236 daf92a37bd1117 kernel/locking/ww_mutex_kunit.c Tamir Duberstein 2025-02-10 237 if (next != NULL) { daf92a37bd1117 kernel/locking/ww_mutex_kunit.c Tamir Duberstein 2025-02-10 @238 const bool trylock = *next & 0b01 >> 0; daf92a37bd1117 kernel/locking/ww_mutex_kunit.c Tamir Duberstein 2025-02-10 239 const bool resolve = *next & 0b10 >> 1; The shifts here are weird... A zero shift is strange but even the 1 shift is odd. The current code is equivalent to: const bool resolve = *next & (0b10 >> 1); But changing it to: const bool resolve = (*next & 0b10) >> 1; Doesn't make sense either... Probably that makes less sense actually. What are you trying to communicate with this code? daf92a37bd1117 kernel/locking/ww_mutex_kunit.c Tamir Duberstein 2025-02-10 240 daf92a37bd1117 kernel/locking/ww_mutex_kunit.c Tamir Duberstein 2025-02-10 241 snprintf(desc, KUNIT_PARAM_DESC_SIZE, "trylock=%d,resolve=%d", trylock, resolve); daf92a37bd1117 kernel/locking/ww_mutex_kunit.c Tamir Duberstein 2025-02-10 242 } daf92a37bd1117 kernel/locking/ww_mutex_kunit.c Tamir Duberstein 2025-02-10 243 return next; daf92a37bd1117 kernel/locking/ww_mutex_kunit.c Tamir Duberstein 2025-02-10 244 } daf92a37bd1117 kernel/locking/ww_mutex_kunit.c Tamir Duberstein 2025-02-10 245 daf92a37bd1117 kernel/locking/ww_mutex_kunit.c Tamir Duberstein 2025-02-10 246 static void test_abba(struct kunit *test) 70207686e492fb kernel/locking/test-ww_mutex.c Chris Wilson 2016-12-01 247 { daf92a37bd1117 kernel/locking/ww_mutex_kunit.c Tamir Duberstein 2025-02-10 248 const unsigned int *param = test->param_value; daf92a37bd1117 kernel/locking/ww_mutex_kunit.c Tamir Duberstein 2025-02-10 @249 const bool trylock = *param & 0b01 >> 0; daf92a37bd1117 kernel/locking/ww_mutex_kunit.c Tamir Duberstein 2025-02-10 250 const bool resolve = *param & 0b10 >> 1; Same. 70207686e492fb kernel/locking/test-ww_mutex.c Chris Wilson 2016-12-01 251 struct test_abba abba; 70207686e492fb kernel/locking/test-ww_mutex.c Chris Wilson 2016-12-01 252 struct ww_acquire_ctx ctx; daf92a37bd1117 kernel/locking/ww_mutex_kunit.c Tamir Duberstein 2025-02-10 253 int err; 70207686e492fb kernel/locking/test-ww_mutex.c Chris Wilson 2016-12-01 254 70207686e492fb kernel/locking/test-ww_mutex.c Chris Wilson 2016-12-01 255 ww_mutex_init(&abba.a_mutex, &ww_class); 70207686e492fb kernel/locking/test-ww_mutex.c Chris Wilson 2016-12-01 256 ww_mutex_init(&abba.b_mutex, &ww_class); 70207686e492fb kernel/locking/test-ww_mutex.c Chris Wilson 2016-12-01 257 INIT_WORK_ONSTACK(&abba.work, test_abba_work); -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
