On Tue, Jan 28, 2025 at 10:54:00PM +0100, Luca Weiss wrote:
> Only go into the if condition for single-PD handling when there's
> actually just one power domain specified there. Otherwise it'll be an
> issue in the dts and we should fail in the regular code path.
> 
> This also mirrors the latest changes in the qcom_q6v5_mss driver.
> 
> Suggested-by: Stephan Gerhold <stephan.gerh...@linaro.org>
> Fixes: 17ee2fb4e856 ("remoteproc: qcom: pas: Vote for active/proxy power 
> domains")
> Signed-off-by: Luca Weiss <l...@lucaweiss.eu>

Not sure if Reviewed-by makes sense if I already did Suggested-by, but
anyway:

Reviewed-by: Stephan Gerhold <stephan.gerh...@linaro.org>

Thanks for making these fixes!

> ---
>  drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_pas.c | 10 +++++-----
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_pas.c 
> b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_pas.c
> index 
> aca44bb6522f00cb525c4b816040445287444434..c1e9bbae61770ccad3e22d132a411bc6ced7180f
>  100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_pas.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_pas.c
> @@ -509,16 +509,16 @@ static int adsp_pds_attach(struct device *dev, struct 
> device **devs,
>       if (!pd_names)
>               return 0;
>  
> +     while (pd_names[num_pds])
> +             num_pds++;
> +
>       /* Handle single power domain */
> -     if (dev->pm_domain) {
> +     if (num_pds == 1 && dev->pm_domain) {
>               devs[0] = dev;
>               pm_runtime_enable(dev);
>               return 1;
>       }
>  
> -     while (pd_names[num_pds])
> -             num_pds++;
> -
>       for (i = 0; i < num_pds; i++) {
>               devs[i] = dev_pm_domain_attach_by_name(dev, pd_names[i]);
>               if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(devs[i])) {
> @@ -543,7 +543,7 @@ static void adsp_pds_detach(struct qcom_adsp *adsp, 
> struct device **pds,
>       int i;
>  
>       /* Handle single power domain */
> -     if (dev->pm_domain && pd_count) {
> +     if (pd_count == 1 && dev->pm_domain) {
>               pm_runtime_disable(dev);
>               return;
>       }
> 
> -- 
> 2.48.1
> 

Reply via email to